Sunday, September 17, 2017

Bees

Tolstoy (War and Peace First Epilogue, Chapter IV):
A bee settling on a flower has stung a child. And the child is afraid of bees and declares that bees exist to sting people. A poet admires the bee sucking from the chalice of a flower and says it exists to suck the fragrance of flowers. A beekeeper, seeing the bee collect pollen from flowers and carry it to the hive, says that it exists to gather honey. Another beekeeper who has studied the life of the hive more closely says that the bee gathers pollen dust to feed the young bees and rear a queen, and that it exists to perpetuate its race. A botanist notices that the bee flying with the pollen of a male flower to a pistil fertilizes the latter, and sees in this the purpose of the bee’s existence. Another, observing the migration of plants, notices that the bee helps in this work, and may say that in this lies the purpose of the bee. But the ultimate purpose of the bee is not exhausted by the first, the second, or any of the processes the human mind can discern. The higher the human intellect rises in the discovery of these purposes, the more obvious it becomes, that the ultimate purpose is beyond our comprehension.
All that is accessible to man is the relation of the life of the bee to other manifestations of life.
Wittgenstein (Culture and Value, p. 29e):
I can say: "Thank these bees for their honey as though they were kind people who have prepared it for you"; that is intelligible and describes how I should like you to conduct yourself. But I cannot say: "Thank them because, look, how kind they are!"--since the next moment they may sting you.
Wittgenstein (Philosophical Investigations 119):
We must do away with all explanation, and description alone must take its place.

5 comments:

  1. sounds like another vote for leaving things as they are, one could instead try and dwell poetically:
    https://www.focusing.org/gendlin/docs/gol_2127.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Or for intellectual humility, which is closely linked to honesty.

      Delete
  2. perhaps tho there is something to showing (not saying) that isn't really about humility as I see it, do you know of finitism in the "strong" program in sociology (esp. soc of tech) has some grammatical roots I think in mathematics that have been associated with Witt.
    ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't, but I'll look into it. Thanks.

      Delete
    2. didn't know this existed, always more books to read:
      Wittgenstein, Rules and Institutions
      By David Bloor

      Delete