Saturday, July 25, 2015

Nordic Wittgenstein Review

[Apologies for the bad links. They should all now be fixed.]

NORDIC WITTGENSTEIN REVIEW 4  (No. 1) 2015
http://www.nordicwittgensteinreview.com/issue/current

NOTE FROM THE EDITORS
Yrsa Neuman, Anne-Marie Søndergaard Christensen, Martin Gustafsson     5-6

INVITED PAPER
On the Origin of Symbolic Mathematics and Its Significance for Wittgenstein’s Thought
Sören Stenlund     7-92

ARTICLES
Aspect-Perception as a Philosophical Method
Reshef Agam-Segal     93-121

Perceptual Experience and Seeing-as
Daniel Enrique Kalpokas     123-144

Wittgenstein on Vaihinger and Frazer
Carlos Alves Pereira     145-165

Does Wittgenstein have a Method? The Challenges of Conant and Schulte
Sebastian Wyss     167-193

FROM THE ARCHIVES
The First Nine Months of Editing Wittgenstein - Letters from G.E.M. Anscombe and Rush Rhees to G.H. von Wright
Christian Eric Erbacher, Sophia Victoria Krebs     195-231

BOOK REVIEWS
Wittgenstein and Logic Today: The Logical Must by Penelope Maddy
Oskari Kuusela     233-236

Beyond the Inner-Outer Model: Subjectivity after Wittgenstein by Chantal Bax
Olli Lagerspetz     237-240

The Nachlass Self-contained: The Textual Genesis of Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations by Nuno Venturinha
Marcos Silva     241-245

Imagination and Calculus: Wittgenstein’s Later Theory of Meaning by Hans Julius Schneider
Martijn Wallage     246-248

***

CALL FOR PAPERS

Nordic Wittgenstein Review welcomes original contributions on all aspects of Ludwig Wittgenstein's thought and work - exegetical studies as well as papers drawing on Wittgensteinian themes and ideas in contemporary discussions of philosophical problems.

The journal is interdisciplinary in character, and welcomes contributions in the subject areas of philosophy and other human and social studies including philology, linguistics, cognitive science, and others. The journal includes an invited paper, an articles section, a section in which high-quality seminal works are re-published or where previously unpublished archival materials are made available for the first time, as well as a book review section.

Nordic Wittgenstein Review is an Open Access journal. In addition to the double-blind peer review, we apply Preprint Open Review, in which accepted papers are available for comments online for a period of one month before further editing and publication.

Sign up as reader in our platform for e-mail notifications.
http://www.nordicwittgensteinreview.com/user/register

INSTRUCTIONS FOR AUTHORS:
http://www.nordicwittgensteinreview.com/about/submissions#onlineSubmissions

Publication: Nordic Wittgenstein Review, Vol 5, No 1  (2016)
Submission deadline: August 31, 2015 (Publication June 2016)
Publication form: Open Access online & Print on pre-order
Peer-review: Yes; double-blind, and Preprint Open Review of accepted papers 1 month
Range: International
Language: English

Published by the Nordic Wittgenstein Society.


FURTHER INFORMATION
http://www.nordicwittgensteinreview.com

NWR is on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/NordicWittgensteinReview
Twitter #nordicwittgensteinreview


The editors of NWR 2015 are Martin Gustafsson (Åbo Akademi University) and Anne-Marie Soendergaard Christensen (University of Southern Denmark). Ed-in-chief Yrsa Neuman (Åbo Akademi University).


*Please do circulate*

8 comments:

  1. http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/rearvision/tackling-foreign-fighters/6619606

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. sure was watching a pbs doc the other day with young american troops who had been in iraq and afghanistan talking about how they couldn't wait for their first kills and thinking about how we rely on this sort of adolescent desire as a tool for our ends.

      Delete
    2. Yes, another reason to go to war basically never.

      Delete
    3. indeed, of course we are ever deeper into:
      "Gunning for the end times: Inside America’s citizen-state arms race"
      http://thisishell.net/pod/20150725a/#.Vb-rp_kUXIU

      Delete
  2. https://podcasts.ox.ac.uk/dose-wittgenstein

    ReplyDelete